Xeon Gold 6314U vs 3020e

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
Xeon Gold 6314U
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
30.23
+1876%

Xeon Gold 6314U outperforms 3020e by a whopping 1876% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2137139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.1313.96
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.53
Xeon Gold 6314U 30.23
+1876%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2433
Xeon Gold 6314U 48013
+1873%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 30.23
Recency 4 August 2020 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 205 Watt

3020e has 3316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6314U, on the other hand, has a 1875.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6314U is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Be aware that 3020e is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6314U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Xeon Gold 6314U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
Intel Xeon Gold 6314U
Xeon Gold 6314U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6314U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Xeon Gold 6314U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.