Ryzen 5 8645HS vs 3020e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
14.37
+839%

Ryzen 5 8645HS outperforms 3020e by a whopping 839% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2121499
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.1330.22
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMERyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.53
Ryzen 5 8645HS 14.37
+839%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2438
Ryzen 5 8645HS 22823
+836%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

3020e 29
Ryzen 5 8645HS 3.29
+781%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

3020e 196
Ryzen 5 8645HS 2094
+968%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

3020e 92
Ryzen 5 8645HS 270
+193%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

3020e 1.1
Ryzen 5 8645HS 11
+900%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

3020e 13
Ryzen 5 8645HS 122
+852%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

3020e 65
Ryzen 5 8645HS 282
+331%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

3020e 1232
Ryzen 5 8645HS 6695
+443%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

3020e 1188
Ryzen 5 8645HS 9420
+693%

Blender(-)

3020e 2964
+1130%
Ryzen 5 8645HS 241

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

3020e 638
Ryzen 5 8645HS 1915
+200%

7-Zip Single

3020e 2597
Ryzen 5 8645HS 6190
+138%

7-Zip

3020e 4963
Ryzen 5 8645HS 55608
+1020%

WebXPRT 3

3020e 105
Ryzen 5 8645HS 295
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 14.37
Integrated graphics card 2.98 14.92
Recency 4 August 2020 6 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

3020e has 650% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8645HS, on the other hand, has a 839.2% higher aggregate performance score, 400.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and Ryzen 5 8645HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
Ryzen 5 8645HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8645HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or Ryzen 5 8645HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.