A4-7300 vs 3020e

VS

Aggregate performance score

3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+59.4%
A4-7300
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

3020e outperforms A4-7300 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing 3020e and A4-7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21372502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)no data
Power efficiency24.121.40
Architecture codenameDali (Zen) (2020)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date4 August 2020 (4 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

3020e and A4-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96 KB
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on 3020e and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT5FM2
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by 3020e and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by 3020e and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by 3020e and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of 3020e and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by 3020e and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by 3020e and A4-7300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

3020e 1.53
+59.4%
A4-7300 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

3020e 2433
+59.1%
A4-7300 1529

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

3020e 661
+85.7%
A4-7300 356

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

3020e 1079
+95.1%
A4-7300 553

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 0.96
Integrated graphics card 2.98 0.97
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

3020e has a 59.4% higher aggregate performance score, 207.2% faster integrated GPU, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that 3020e is a notebook processor while A4-7300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between 3020e and A4-7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD 3020e
3020e
AMD A4-7300
A4-7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 98 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about 3020e or A4-7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.