Quadro RTX 8000 vs Wii U GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated60
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.87
Power efficiencyno data13.31
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameLatteTU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 November 2012 (11 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1604608
Core clock speed550 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors880 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800509.8
Floating-point processing power0.176 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 November 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 260 Watt

Wii U GPU has 687.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Wii U GPU and Quadro RTX 8000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Wii U GPU is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Wii U GPU
Wii U GPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 11 votes

Rate Wii U GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 447 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.