Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs UHD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge), including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2020
15 Watt
6.39
+163%

UHD Graphics P630 outperforms R5 (Bristol Ridge) by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking569832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.743.90
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Bristol Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1200 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+145%
11
−145%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4
+0%
4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7
+0%
7
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 is 145% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R5 (Bristol Ridge) is ahead in 29 tests (54%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.39 2.43
Recency 13 May 2020 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 163% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R5 (Bristol Ridge), on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 24 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.