Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs UHD Graphics 620

Place in the ranking	810	839
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.20	3.72
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	Bristol Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2017 (7 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR3/DDR4	no data
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.67
+9.4%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 2.44

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 620 1744
+1.4%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1720

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 620 1168

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1284
+9.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 620 9324
+12.9%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 8256

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 620 88746
+53%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 58018

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
1440p	15 +25%	12−14 −25%
4K	7 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6
+20%

5−6

−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8 +0%	8−9 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	8 +167%	3−4 −167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	10 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	38 +245%	10−12 −245%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40 +100%	20−22 −100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +28.6%	7 −28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +36.4%	10−12 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30 −23.3%	35−40 +23.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	36 +227%	10−12 −227%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	34 +70%	20−22 −70%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	11 +0%	10−12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +7.7%	13 −7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Hitman 3	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5 −300%	20−22 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −333%	12−14 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +2.7%	35−40 −2.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and R5 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 620 is 8% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 620 is 25% faster in 1440p
UHD Graphics 620 is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 245% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 333% faster.

All in all, in popular games: