Radeon RX 7800 XT vs UHD Graphics 770

Place in the ranking	574	30
Place by popularity	28	84
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.70
Power efficiency	28.39	16.57
Architecture	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Raptor Lake GT1	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	27 September 2022 (2 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	3840
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	583.2
Floating-point processing power	0.8448 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	96
TMUs	16	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Motherboard Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.15

RX 7800 XT 62.94
+923%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016

RX 7800 XT 24285
+2290%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 770 16443

RX 7800 XT 65611
+299%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 770 2655

RX 7800 XT 134322
+4959%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 770 3428

RX 7800 XT 49707
+1350%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 770 119185

RX 7800 XT 202773
+70.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −1117%	219 +1117%
1440p	12−14 −958%	127 +958%
4K	13 −469%	74 +469%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.28
1440p	no data	3.93
4K	no data	6.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−2050%

258
+2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −1013%	178 +1013%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 −1608%	222 +1608%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −1071%	190−200 +1071%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −777%	110−120 +777%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −1830%	193 +1830%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −707%	110−120 +707%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −788%	150−160 +788%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −475%	230−240 +475%
Hitman 3	12−14 −933%	120−130 +933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −530%	230−240 +530%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −869%	150−160 +869%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −594%	110−120 +594%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −1119%	250−260 +1119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −200%	150−160 +200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −1531%	261 +1531%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −2486%	181 +2486%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −1071%	190−200 +1071%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −777%	110−120 +777%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1510%	161 +1510%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −707%	110−120 +707%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −788%	150−160 +788%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −475%	230−240 +475%
Hitman 3	12−14 −933%	120−130 +933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −530%	230−240 +530%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −869%	150−160 +869%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −594%	110−120 +594%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 −2111%	398 +2111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −560%	130−140 +560%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −200%	150−160 +200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −713%	130 +713%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −2157%	158 +2157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −777%	110−120 +777%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −1380%	148 +1380%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −707%	110−120 +707%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −455%	222 +455%
Hitman 3	12−14 −933%	120−130 +933%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 −2183%	274 +2183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −2025%	340 +2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −2122%	200 +2122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −190%	145 +190%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−594%

110−120
+594%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −1067%	140−150 +1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −989%	95−100 +989%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1883%	119 +1883%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −12300%	124 +12300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1133%	70−75 +1133%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3133%	97 +3133%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −943%	70−75 +943%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −1326%	270−280 +1326%
Hitman 3	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1569%	217 +1569%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −2860%	148 +2860%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −12050%	243 +12050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2840%	147 +2840%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −503%	230−240 +503%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−855%

100−110
+855%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −1360%	70−75 +1360%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −1294%	220−230 +1294%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −3033%	90−95 +3033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −5800%	118 +5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2300%	72 +2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	44
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1333%	40−45 +1333%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2633%	164 +2633%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	130
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −3250%	67 +3250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−967%

60−65
+967%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 1117% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 958% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 469% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 12300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed UHD Graphics 770 in all 70 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.15	62.94
Recency	27 September 2022	25 August 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	263 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 1653.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 923.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.