RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics 770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.15

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 944% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57829
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Power efficiency28.5934.45
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2566144
Core clock speed300 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40417.6
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data360.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.15
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.22
+944%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24773
+2338%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−900%
180−190
+900%
4K13
−900%
130−140
+900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
−900%
120−130
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−900%
130−140
+900%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−900%
100−105
+900%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Hitman 3 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−900%
210−220
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−900%
500−550
+900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Hitman 3 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−846%
350−400
+846%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−900%
180−190
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−900%
200−210
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−900%
500−550
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−900%
400−450
+900%
Hitman 3 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
−900%
120−130
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−900%
160−170
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−900%
90−95
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−900%
500−550
+900%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−900%
170−180
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−900%
190−200
+900%
Hitman 3 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−900%
130−140
+900%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−926%
400−450
+926%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Hitman 3 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 900% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.15 64.22
Recency 27 September 2022 9 August 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 130 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 766.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 944.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1234 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.