ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 vs UHD Graphics 620

Place in the ranking	812	1445
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.30	no data
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	RS690
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2017 (7 years ago)	28 February 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4
Core clock speed	300 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	120 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	24.00	1.600
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	4
TMUs	24	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR3/DDR4	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.68
+2336%

ATI Xpress 1250 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 620 1030
+2352%

ATI Xpress 1250 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13	0−1
1440p	16	0−1
4K	9	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Elden Ring	5−6	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	10 +100%	5−6 −100%
Metro Exodus	6	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
Valorant	9	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Dota 2	10	0−1
Elden Ring	5−6	0−1
Far Cry 5	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Fortnite	14−16	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Grand Theft Auto V	5	0−1
Metro Exodus	3	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27 +440%	5−6 −440%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
World of Tanks	37 +270%	10−11 −270%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Dota 2	18	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +180%	5−6 −180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Elden Ring	2−3	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
World of Tanks	18−20	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Valorant	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Elden Ring	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	7 −114%	14−16 +114%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Fortnite	1−2	0−1
Valorant	2−3	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 1800% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Xpress 1250 is 114% faster.

All in all, in popular games: