Quadro T2000 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 600

Place in the ranking	1133	269
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.98	23.83
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	1024
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	114.2
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	12	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87

T2000 Mobile 20.77
+2287%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334

T2000 Mobile 7985
+2291%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 600 578

T2000 Mobile 13524
+2240%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 −2200%	230−240 +2200%
1440p	1 −2000%	21−24 +2000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −1367%	85−90 +1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Dota 2	2 −3550%	70−75 +3550%
Far Cry 5	4 −1600%	65−70 +1600%
Fortnite	2−3 −5350%	100−110 +5350%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −1367%	85−90 +1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	11 −1155%	130−140 +1155%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1024%	230−240 +1024%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Dota 2	7 −943%	70−75 +943%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%
Forza Horizon 4	4 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1155%	130−140 +1155%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3340%	170−180 +3340%
World of Tanks	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1040%	55−60 +1040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Valorant	6−7 −800%	50−55 +800%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −3000%	60−65 +3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Valorant	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Elden Ring	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 2200% faster in 1080p
T2000 Mobile is 2000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 5350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is ahead in 37 tests (60%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.87	20.77
Recency	11 December 2017	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	60 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 1100% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2287.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.