GeForce 8800 GTX vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) with GeForce 8800 GTX, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.01
+54.6%

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms 8800 GTX by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867992
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data0.66
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeG80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)8 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24575
Core clock speed450 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data681 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data155 Watt
Texture fill rateno data36.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data270 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data768 MB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data86.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+60%
5−6
−60%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data119.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Valorant 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 6
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Valorant 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Valorant 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and 8800 GTX compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is 60% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 1.30
Recency 3 January 2023 8 November 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has a 54.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook card while GeForce 8800 GTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 91 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 140 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) or GeForce 8800 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.