RTX A4000 vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with RTX A4000, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
32.58

RTX A4000 outperforms Titan X Pascal by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.70no data
Power efficiency9.2224.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP102GA104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35846144
Core clock speed1417 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9299.5
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs224192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 32.58
RTX A4000 48.96
+50.3%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
RTX A4000 19575
+50.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
−45.2%
180−190
+45.2%
1440p74
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
4K58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67no data
1440p16.20no data
4K20.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 337
−48.4%
500−550
+48.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
−42.9%
170−180
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 153
−43.8%
220−230
+43.8%
Counter-Strike 2 291
−37.5%
400−450
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
−48.6%
110−120
+48.6%
Far Cry 5 162
−48.1%
240−250
+48.1%
Fortnite 210
−42.9%
300−310
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 127
−49.6%
190−200
+49.6%
Forza Horizon 5 119
−42.9%
170−180
+42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
−44.4%
130−140
+44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
−41.6%
160−170
+41.6%
Valorant 296
−35.1%
400−450
+35.1%
Battlefield 5 147
−49.7%
220−230
+49.7%
Counter-Strike 2 205
−46.3%
300−310
+46.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−44.9%
400−450
+44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
−46.2%
95−100
+46.2%
Dota 2 252
−38.9%
350−400
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 149
−47.7%
220−230
+47.7%
Fortnite 199
−45.7%
290−300
+45.7%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−48.8%
180−190
+48.8%
Forza Horizon 5 106
−41.5%
150−160
+41.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
−50%
240−250
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 96
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
−41.6%
160−170
+41.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
−46.7%
270−280
+46.7%
Valorant 275
−45.5%
400−450
+45.5%
Battlefield 5 137
−46%
200−210
+46%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
−49.1%
85−90
+49.1%
Dota 2 232
−29.3%
300−310
+29.3%
Far Cry 5 140
−50%
210−220
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 112
−42.9%
160−170
+42.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
−47.1%
150−160
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Valorant 181
−49.2%
270−280
+49.2%
Fortnite 170
−47.1%
250−260
+47.1%
Counter-Strike 2 111
−44.1%
160−170
+44.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−37%
300−310
+37%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−45.6%
150−160
+45.6%
Metro Exodus 58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−48.6%
260−270
+48.6%
Valorant 258
−35.7%
350−400
+35.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.9%
120−130
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Far Cry 5 101
−48.5%
150−160
+48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−39.5%
120−130
+39.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 41
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Fortnite 80−85
−50%
120−130
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
−41.4%
140−150
+41.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Valorant 257
−36.2%
350−400
+36.2%
Battlefield 5 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Dota 2 160
−50%
240−250
+50%
Far Cry 5 53
−41.5%
75−80
+41.5%
Forza Horizon 4 73
−37%
100−105
+37%
Hogwarts Legacy 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Fortnite 60
−50%
90−95
+50%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 45% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 is 49% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 is 47% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.58 48.96
Recency 2 August 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 140 Watt

RTX A4000 has a 50.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6
3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
654 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.