Quadro M1200 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake-U G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VS
Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M Quadro M2200 Quadro M3000M Quadro M4000M Quadro M5000M Quadro M5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro M1200, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.03
+19.5%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms M1200 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking447497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.91
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96640
Core clock speedno data1093 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data43.72
Floating-point processing powerno data1.399 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.03
+19.5%
Quadro M1200 8.39

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+20.7%
Quadro M1200 4142

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+3.4%
29
−3.4%
4K12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.9%
55−60
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.9%
55−60
−17.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+12.5%
45−50
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+24%
24−27
−24%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+17.4%
21−24
−17.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+17.9%
55−60
−17.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+100%
13
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M1200 compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.03 8.39
Recency 15 August 2020 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 19.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M1200 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA Quadro M1200
Quadro M1200
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R9 M390 Radeon R9 M390
Quadro M1200 Quadro M1200
vs
Pro 555X Radeon Pro 555X
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 760 GeForce GTX 760
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile
GT 720 OEM GeForce GT 720 OEM
vs
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
HD 7670A Radeon HD 7670A
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce MX110 GeForce MX110
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 331 vote

Rate Quadro M1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.