GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs TITAN Xp

#ad 
Buy
GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
VS
#ad 
Buy
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN Xp and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN Xp
2017
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
43.47
+50.5%

TITAN Xp outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
GTX 1660 Ti GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69170
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.4539.00
Power efficiency13.7919.10
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 April 2017 (7 years ago)22 February 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti has 213% better value for money than TITAN Xp.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401536
Core clock speed1405 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate379.7169.9
Floating-point processing power12.15 TFLOPS5.437 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs24096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1426 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth547.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN Xp 43.47
+50.5%
GTX 1660 Ti 28.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN Xp 19424
+50.5%
GTX 1660 Ti 12909

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN Xp 72561
+19%
GTX 1660 Ti 60972

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

TITAN Xp 86911
+49%
GTX 1660 Ti 58320

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

TITAN Xp 58384
GTX 1660 Ti 65308
+11.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+44.2%
104
−44.2%
1440p85−90
+44.1%
59
−44.1%
4K55−60
+41%
39
−41%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.99
−198%
2.68
+198%
1440p14.11
−198%
4.73
+198%
4K21.80
−205%
7.15
+205%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 198% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 198% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 205% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 247
+0%
247
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+0%
131
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
+0%
200
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+0%
57
+0%
Dota 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+0%
119
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
+0%
150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+0%
116
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Dota 2 168
+0%
168
+0%
Far Cry 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+0%
97
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 118
+0%
118
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
+0%
117
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+0%
62
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+0%
77
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
+0%
75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+0%
56
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+0%
39
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%

This is how TITAN Xp and GTX 1660 Ti compete in popular games:

  • TITAN Xp is 44% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN Xp is 44% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN Xp is 41% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 43.47 28.89
Recency 6 April 2017 22 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

TITAN Xp has a 50.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The TITAN Xp is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
TITAN Xp
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2080 Super GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Tesla T4 T4
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 590 590
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Mobile
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
GTX 1650 1650
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
GTX 1660 1660
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 4000 4000
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
Tesla K80 K80
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 5700 XT 5700 XT
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
TITAN Xp TITAN Xp
vs
RTX 2060 Super 2060 Super

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.1 4683 votes

Rate TITAN Xp on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 8360 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN Xp or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.