Radeon RX Vega 64 vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
TITAN V TITAN V CEO Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano Radeon RX Vega XL Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V and Radeon RX Vega 64, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
41.55
+20.4%

TITAN V outperforms RX Vega 64 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

TITAN V TITAN V
RX Vega 64 RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking82132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.74
Power efficiency12.258.62
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

TITAN V and RX Vega 64 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1546 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6395.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS12.66 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm279 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA7.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 41.55
+20.4%
RX Vega 64 34.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN V 17125
+20.4%
RX Vega 64 14219

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+18.6%
118
−18.6%
1440p152
+90%
80
−90%
4K82
+57.7%
52
−57.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p21.42
−407%
4.23
+407%
1440p19.73
−216%
6.24
+216%
4K36.57
−281%
9.60
+281%
  • RX Vega 64 has 407% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX Vega 64 has 216% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX Vega 64 has 281% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Valorant 182
+0%
182
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 174
+0%
174
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Dota 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 123
+0%
123
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+0%
164
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+0%
57
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 92
+0%
92
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Dota 2 138
+0%
138
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 143
+0%
143
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 140
+0%
140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 95
+0%
95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 46
+0%
46
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 49
+0%
49
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RX Vega 64 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 19% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 90% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 58% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 41.55 34.50
Recency 7 December 2017 7 August 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 295 Watt

TITAN V has a 20.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 18% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 64 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
RX Vega 64 Radeon RX Vega 64
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
TITAN V TITAN V
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Instinct MI25 Radeon Instinct MI25
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Pro SSG Radeon Pro SSG
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
TITAN V TITAN V

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 3296 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 735 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.