Quadro T1000 vs TITAN RTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
48.94
+191%

TITAN RTX outperforms T1000 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking66324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency11.9823.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1350 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.94
+191%
Quadro T1000 16.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
+192%
Quadro T1000 6469

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

TITAN RTX 148590
+339%
Quadro T1000 33875

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

TITAN RTX 125842
+318%
Quadro T1000 30130

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

TITAN RTX 166517
+386%
Quadro T1000 34236

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD161
+193%
55−60
−193%
1440p101
+237%
30−35
−237%
4K72
+200%
24−27
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.52no data
1440p24.74no data
4K34.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+197%
35−40
−197%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+197%
35−40
−197%
Battlefield 5 209
+199%
70−75
−199%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 143
+218%
45−50
−218%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Far Cry 5 127
+218%
40−45
−218%
Far Cry New Dawn 201
+209%
65−70
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 281
+196%
95−100
−196%
Hitman 3 117
+193%
40−45
−193%
Horizon Zero Dawn 348
+216%
110−120
−216%
Metro Exodus 144
+220%
45−50
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+218%
40−45
−218%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 206
+194%
70−75
−194%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+207%
70−75
−207%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 186
+210%
60−65
−210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+193%
30−33
−193%
Battlefield 5 203
+212%
65−70
−212%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+228%
40−45
−228%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Far Cry 5 101
+237%
30−33
−237%
Far Cry New Dawn 154
+208%
50−55
−208%
Forza Horizon 4 254
+199%
85−90
−199%
Hitman 3 116
+231%
35−40
−231%
Horizon Zero Dawn 336
+205%
110−120
−205%
Metro Exodus 144
+220%
45−50
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110
+214%
35−40
−214%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 286
+201%
95−100
−201%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+237%
30−33
−237%
Watch Dogs: Legion 204
+214%
65−70
−214%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+196%
27−30
−196%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+240%
30−33
−240%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+225%
24−27
−225%
Far Cry 5 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+192%
60−65
−192%
Hitman 3 111
+217%
35−40
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 218
+211%
70−75
−211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 242
+203%
80−85
−203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+209%
45−50
−209%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+219%
27−30
−219%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 123
+208%
40−45
−208%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+227%
30−33
−227%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+213%
24−27
−213%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+214%
21−24
−214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+214%
21−24
−214%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+200%
85−90
−200%
Hitman 3 100
+233%
30−33
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 168
+205%
55−60
−205%
Metro Exodus 114
+226%
35−40
−226%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+205%
60−65
−205%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+221%
24−27
−221%
Watch Dogs: Legion 205
+193%
70−75
−193%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+198%
40−45
−198%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+193%
30−33
−193%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+219%
21−24
−219%
Hitman 3 48
+200%
16−18
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+200%
50−55
−200%
Metro Exodus 121
+203%
40−45
−203%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+194%
35−40
−194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+225%
16−18
−225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+207%
14−16
−207%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+213%
16−18
−213%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+230%
10−11
−230%
Far Cry 5 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+226%
35−40
−226%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+211%
35−40
−211%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+207%
14−16
−207%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+208%
24−27
−208%

This is how TITAN RTX and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 193% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 237% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.94 16.79
Recency 18 December 2018 27 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 50 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 191.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 460% lower power consumption.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 813 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 407 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.