RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs T600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T600 with RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

T600
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 40 Watt
16.75

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms T600 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31992
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency29.0025.51
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404608
Core clock speed735 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1335 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate53.40no data
Floating-point processing power1.709 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T600 16.75
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 42.36
+153%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T600 6464
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 16345
+153%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T600 8694
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 28847
+232%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T600 6552
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 20571
+214%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T600 40917
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 82612
+102%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55
−136%
130−140
+136%
1440p24
−150%
60−65
+150%
4K22
−150%
55−60
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−152%
270−280
+152%
Hitman 3 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−146%
140−150
+146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−152%
270−280
+152%
Hitman 3 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−146%
140−150
+146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−135%
120−130
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−152%
270−280
+152%
Hitman 3 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
−144%
95−100
+144%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
−144%
110−120
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−141%
65−70
+141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−141%
200−210
+141%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−139%
110−120
+139%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−144%
220−230
+144%
Hitman 3 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−141%
65−70
+141%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−150%
75−80
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−150%
80−85
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−145%
250−260
+145%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−147%
210−220
+147%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−150%
40−45
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%

This is how T600 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 136% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.75 42.36
Recency 6 May 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 115 Watt

T600 has 187.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 152.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.

Be aware that T600 is a workstation card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T600
T600
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 679 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.