Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics vs T400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking466not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.70no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU117Beema
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)28 January 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed420 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate34.202.400
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.66.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2.170
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2021 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

T400 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

R2E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between T400 and Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T400 is a workstation card while Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T400
T400
AMD Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 375 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.