Radeon 780M vs Riva 128 PCI
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 284 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 56 |
| Architecture | no data | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | NV3 | Phoenix |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 April 1997 (27 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4 million | 25,390 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 350 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 0.1 | 139.2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Riva 128 PCI and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | SDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 100 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 1.6 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA, 1x DB13W3 | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 5.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 1.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 1997 | 5 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 350 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 54 Watt |
Riva 128 PCI has 1250% lower power consumption.
Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, and a 8650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Riva 128 PCI and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Riva 128 PCI is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
