GRID M60-8Q vs ATI Rage 128 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.07
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRage 4 PROGM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 August 1999 (25 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed118 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors8 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.24150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs2128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 1999 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

GRID M60-8Q has an age advantage of 16 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage 128 PRO and GRID M60-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage 128 PRO is a desktop card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage 128 PRO
Rage 128 PRO
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 31 vote

Rate Rage 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.