Radeon RX 6950 XT vs VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII and Radeon RX 6950 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
43.22

RX 6950 XT outperforms Radeon VII by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation66.0622.76
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameVega 20Navi
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $1,099
Current price$160 (0.2x MSRP)$961 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon VII has 190% better value for money than RX 6950 XT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38405120
Core clock speed1400 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHz2324 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt335 Watt
Texture fill rate420.0743.7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 43.22
RX 6950 XT 73.28
+69.6%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon VII 16690
RX 6950 XT 28299
+69.6%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 70% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon VII 37881
RX 6950 XT 72228
+90.7%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 91% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon VII 62128
RX 6950 XT 119918
+93%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 93% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon VII 27449
RX 6950 XT 59882
+118%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 118% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon VII 146094
RX 6950 XT 229172
+56.9%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 57% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Radeon VII 430170
RX 6950 XT 497297
+15.6%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 16% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 110
RX 6950 XT 143
+29.8%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 30% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 87
RX 6950 XT 188
+115%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 115% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 19
RX 6950 XT 53
+181%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 181% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 170
RX 6950 XT 284
+66.7%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 67% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 62
RX 6950 XT 139
+125%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 125% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 52
RX 6950 XT 77
+49.1%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 49% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Radeon VII 17
RX 6950 XT 29
+69.8%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 70% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Radeon VII 175
RX 6950 XT 451
+158%

RX 6950 XT outperforms VII by 158% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
−74%
214
+74%
1440p76
−77.6%
135
+77.6%
4K58
−48.3%
86
+48.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99 no data
Battlefield 5 160 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 116 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 113 no data
Forza Horizon 4 163 no data
Hitman 3 81 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 155 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 126 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 113 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82 no data
Battlefield 5 150 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 90 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 102 no data
Forza Horizon 4 227 no data
Hitman 3 79 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180 no data
Metro Exodus 46 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 121 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 211 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 71 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 63 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 89 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 66 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80 no data
Metro Exodus 83 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 48 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 86 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 58 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 46 no data
Hitman 3 46 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 57 no data
Metro Exodus 61 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 29 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43 no data

This is how Radeon VII and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 74% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 78% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 48% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.22 73.28
Recency 7 February 2019 10 May 2022
Cost $699 $1099
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 335 Watt

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon VII in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2841 vote

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2624 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.