GeForce GTX 285M vs Radeon VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII with GeForce GTX 285M, including specs and performance data.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
36.71
+2485%

VII outperforms GTX 285M by a whopping 2485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking100962
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.11no data
Power efficiency9.881.50
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 20G92
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)1 February 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840128
Core clock speed1400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate420.038.40
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data576
ROPs6416
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
SLI options-2-way
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzUp to 1020 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s61 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aSingle Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 36.71
+2485%
GTX 285M 1.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16402
+2479%
GTX 285M 636

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+856%
GTX 285M 6498

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p500−550
+2281%
21
−2281%
Full HD120
+300%
30
−300%
1440p74
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
4K57
+2750%
2−3
−2750%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.83no data
1440p9.45no data
4K12.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+2875%
4−5
−2875%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+2688%
8−9
−2688%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+2875%
4−5
−2875%
Battlefield 5 136
+4433%
3−4
−4433%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+2688%
8−9
−2688%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Far Cry 5 99 0−1
Fortnite 195
+3800%
5−6
−3800%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+1938%
8−9
−1938%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157
+1470%
10−11
−1470%
Valorant 220−230
+536%
35−40
−536%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
+2875%
4−5
−2875%
Battlefield 5 137
+4467%
3−4
−4467%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+2688%
8−9
−2688%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+742%
30−35
−742%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Dota 2 160
+742%
18−20
−742%
Far Cry 5 95 0−1
Fortnite 154
+2980%
5−6
−2980%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+1863%
8−9
−1863%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+5450%
2−3
−5450%
Metro Exodus 88
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158
+1480%
10−11
−1480%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+2217%
6−7
−2217%
Valorant 220−230
+536%
35−40
−536%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Dota 2 147
+674%
18−20
−674%
Far Cry 5 91 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 130
+1525%
8−9
−1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+1330%
10−11
−1330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
Valorant 197
+447%
35−40
−447%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114
+2180%
5−6
−2180%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+10200%
1−2
−10200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2620%
10−11
−2620%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Metro Exodus 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1067%
14−16
−1067%
Valorant 260−270
+2789%
9−10
−2789%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+3233%
3−4
−3233%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+4650%
2−3
−4650%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2750%
4−5
−2750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+3400%
3−4
−3400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+313%
14−16
−313%
Metro Exodus 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Valorant 240−250
+2900%
8−9
−2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 78
+3800%
2−3
−3800%
Far Cry 5 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+1833%
3−4
−1833%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+1367%
3−4
−1367%

This is how Radeon VII and GTX 285M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 2281% faster in 900p
  • Radeon VII is 300% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 3600% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 2750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 10200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Radeon VII surpassed GTX 285M in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.71 1.42
Recency 7 February 2019 1 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon VII has a 2485.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 285M, on the other hand, has 293.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 285M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 285M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 285M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2881 vote

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or GeForce GTX 285M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.