Radeon RX 7900M vs RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon RX 7900M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.08

RX 7900M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking44933
Place by popularity40not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameVegaNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speedno data1825 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data601.9

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.08
RX 7900M 57.64
+535%

RX 7900M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 535% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
RX 7900M 59943
+918%

RX 7900M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 918% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3743
RX 7900M 50241
+1242%

RX 7900M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by 1242% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−530%
145
+530%
1440p16
−563%
106
+563%
4K10
−660%
76
+660%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
−532%
120−130
+532%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−395%
90−95
+395%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
−395%
95−100
+395%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−554%
180−190
+554%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−506%
100−110
+506%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−507%
85−90
+507%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−419%
100−110
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−456%
130−140
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−334%
190−200
+334%
Hitman 3 15
−647%
110−120
+647%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
−448%
240−250
+448%
Metro Exodus 35
−286%
130−140
+286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−255%
110−120
+255%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
−694%
250−260
+694%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−481%
120−130
+481%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−395%
90−95
+395%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−519%
95−100
+519%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−554%
180−190
+554%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−506%
100−110
+506%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−419%
100−110
+419%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−456%
130−140
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−334%
190−200
+334%
Hitman 3 16
−600%
110−120
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−518%
240−250
+518%
Metro Exodus 25
−440%
130−140
+440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
−368%
110−120
+368%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−841%
250−260
+841%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−686%
160−170
+686%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−270%
120−130
+270%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−395%
90−95
+395%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
−607%
95−100
+607%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−506%
100−110
+506%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−419%
100−110
+419%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−334%
190−200
+334%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−904%
240−250
+904%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−1396%
344
+1396%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−1100%
168
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−917%
120−130
+917%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−457%
110−120
+457%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−780%
130−140
+780%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−527%
65−70
+527%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−727%
90−95
+727%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 16
−669%
123
+669%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Hitman 3 10
−710%
80−85
+710%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−585%
130−140
+585%
Metro Exodus 17
−494%
100−110
+494%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−1456%
249
+1456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1113%
95−100
+1113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
−650%
60−65
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−654%
95−100
+654%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−800%
50−55
+800%
Hitman 3 5−6
−880%
45−50
+880%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−811%
80−85
+811%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−1167%
76
+1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−700%
85−90
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
−720%
80−85
+720%
Metro Exodus 8
−725%
65−70
+725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−533%
55−60
+533%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 530% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 563% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 660% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900M is 1833% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900M surpassed RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.08 57.64
Recency 7 January 2020 19 October 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 932 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.