GeForce GTX 580 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with GeForce GTX 580, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.01

GTX 580 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488408
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.06
Power efficiency41.353.38
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVegaGF110
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)9 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speedno data772 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt244 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rateno data49.41
Floating-point processing powerno data1.581 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1536 MB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2004 MHz (4008 data rate)
Memory bandwidthno data192.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-+
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.01
GTX 580 11.99
+33.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
GTX 580 6065
+3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 22428
+2.2%
GTX 580 21941

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3743
GTX 580 4970
+32.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
−35%
54
+35%
Full HD23
−313%
95
+313%
1200p55−60
−41.8%
78
+41.8%
1440p17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
4K9
−11.1%
10−12
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.25
1440pno data23.76
4Kno data49.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Elden Ring 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 32
−50%
45−50
+50%
Metro Exodus 27
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Valorant 44
−6.8%
45−50
+6.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−109%
21−24
+109%
Dota 2 29
−48.3%
40−45
+48.3%
Elden Ring 22
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 30
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Fortnite 50−55
−30.2%
65−70
+30.2%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−77.8%
45−50
+77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 19
−126%
40−45
+126%
Metro Exodus 19
−73.7%
30−35
+73.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 57
−57.9%
90−95
+57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12
−158%
30−35
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
Valorant 14
−236%
45−50
+236%
World of Tanks 48
−244%
160−170
+244%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−156%
21−24
+156%
Dota 2 48
+11.6%
40−45
−11.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−109%
45−50
+109%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−26.8%
90−95
+26.8%
Valorant 37
−27%
45−50
+27%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Elden Ring 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
−214%
65−70
+214%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
World of Tanks 21
−305%
85−90
+305%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 2
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−75%
27−30
+75%
Metro Exodus 17
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Valorant 39
+30%
30−33
−30%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 10
−120%
21−24
+120%
Elden Ring 6
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−120%
21−24
+120%
Metro Exodus 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−169%
35−40
+169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−120%
21−24
+120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 18
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Fortnite 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Valorant 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GTX 580 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580 is 35% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580 is 313% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580 is 42% faster in 1200p
  • GTX 580 is 24% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 580 is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 30% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 580 is 350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • GTX 580 is ahead in 60 tests (95%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.01 11.99
Recency 7 January 2020 9 November 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 244 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1526.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 580, on the other hand, has a 33.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1260 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 473 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.