Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	658	not rated
Place by popularity	30	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.91	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2020)	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	Crestline
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 October 2017 (7 years ago)	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	8
Core clock speed	no data	500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	13.5 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

-

-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

10

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	26 October 2017	9 May 2007
Chip lithography	14 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	13 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---