Radeon Pro 575X vs RX Vega 64
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 126 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 24.24 | no data |
Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | Vega | Polaris 20 |
Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 14 August 2017 (7 years ago) | 18 March 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1630 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 120 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 395.8 | 140.3 |
Floating-point performance | 12.66 gflops | 4.489 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 945 MHz | 6800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 217.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 14 August 2017 | 18 March 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 295 Watt | 120 Watt |
RX Vega 64 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 145.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.