HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with HD Graphics 400, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.49
+386%

RX Vega 11 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 386% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6121083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.8012.96
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameRavenBraswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70496
Core clock speed300 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate55.047.200
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs4412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
+386%
HD Graphics 400 1.13

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 11 3494
+676%
HD Graphics 400 450

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+460%
5−6
−460%
1440p5
+400%
1−2
−400%
4K12
+500%
2−3
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Valorant 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Dota 2 27
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry 5 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Fortnite 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Metro Exodus 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+440%
10−11
−440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Valorant 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
World of Tanks 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Dota 2 42
+425%
8−9
−425%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Valorant 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+400%
3−4
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how RX Vega 11 and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 460% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 1.13
Recency 10 May 2018 1 April 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 385.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1823 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 419 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.