GMA 3150 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6171536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.77no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameRavenPineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores70416
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate55.040.8
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs442

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)3.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+105350%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28no data
1440p5no data
4K12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 18 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Dota 2 27 no data
Far Cry 5 30 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 17 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 17 no data
Metro Exodus 11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data
World of Tanks 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Dota 2 42 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 15 no data
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data
World of Tanks 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 5 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 14−16 no data

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 17 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 169.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1823 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 142 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.