T400 4 GB vs Radeon RX 7900 XT

Place in the ranking	12	461
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	37.26	no data
Power efficiency	17.27	22.51
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 31	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$899	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5376	384
Core clock speed	1387 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	2394 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	57,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	804.4	34.20
Floating-point processing power	51.48 TFLOPS	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	192	16
TMUs	336	24
Ray Tracing Cores	84	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	276 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	320 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	800.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 XT 75.25
+667%

T400 4 GB 9.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7900 XT 28928
+667%

T400 4 GB 3770

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	205 +754%	24−27 −754%
1440p	134 +738%	16−18 −738%
4K	88 +780%	10−12 −780%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.39	no data
1440p	6.71	no data
4K	10.22	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	170−180 +743%	21−24 −743%
Cyberpunk 2077	237 +690%	30−33 −690%
Elden Ring	230 +752%	27−30 −752%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +736%	14−16 −736%
Counter-Strike 2	190 +692%	24−27 −692%
Cyberpunk 2077	106 +783%	12−14 −783%
Forza Horizon 4	580 +673%	75−80 −673%
Metro Exodus	163 +676%	21−24 −676%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +763%	16−18 −763%
Valorant	400−450 +712%	50−55 −712%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +736%	14−16 −736%
Counter-Strike 2	186 +675%	24−27 −675%
Cyberpunk 2077	95 +692%	12−14 −692%
Dota 2	181 +762%	21−24 −762%
Elden Ring	290−300 +740%	35−40 −740%
Far Cry 5	110 +686%	14−16 −686%
Fortnite	300−350 +760%	35−40 −760%
Forza Horizon 4	492 +720%	60−65 −720%
Grand Theft Auto V	173 +724%	21−24 −724%
Metro Exodus	161 +794%	18−20 −794%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +696%	27−30 −696%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130−140 +763%	16−18 −763%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +729%	21−24 −729%
Valorant	400−450 +712%	50−55 −712%
World of Tanks	270−280 +697%	35−40 −697%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +736%	14−16 −736%
Counter-Strike 2	168 +700%	21−24 −700%
Cyberpunk 2077	89 +790%	10−11 −790%
Dota 2	184 +776%	21−24 −776%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +683%	18−20 −683%
Forza Horizon 4	424 +671%	55−60 −671%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +696%	27−30 −696%
Valorant	400−450 +712%	50−55 −712%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	159 +783%	18−20 −783%
Elden Ring	200−210 +763%	24−27 −763%
Grand Theft Auto V	159 +783%	18−20 −783%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +733%	21−24 −733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +675%	12−14 −675%
World of Tanks	500−550 +694%	65−70 −694%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +770%	10−11 −770%
Counter-Strike 2	124 +675%	16−18 −675%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +771%	7−8 −771%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +789%	18−20 −789%
Forza Horizon 4	325 +713%	40−45 −713%
Metro Exodus	141 +683%	18−20 −683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +719%	21−24 −719%
Valorant	300−350 +669%	45−50 −669%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50 +733%	6−7 −733%
Dota 2	175 +733%	21−24 −733%
Elden Ring	110−120 +700%	14−16 −700%
Grand Theft Auto V	175 +733%	21−24 −733%
Metro Exodus	87 +770%	10−11 −770%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +674%	27−30 −674%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +700%	8−9 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	175 +733%	21−24 −733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +810%	10−11 −810%
Counter-Strike 2	95−100 +708%	12−14 −708%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +900%	3−4 −900%
Dota 2	153 +750%	18−20 −750%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +775%	12−14 −775%
Fortnite	95−100 +700%	12−14 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +724%	21−24 −724%
Valorant	200−210 +738%	24−27 −738%

This is how RX 7900 XT and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 754% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 738% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 780% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	75.25	9.81
Recency	3 November 2022	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	20 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	30 Watt

RX 7900 XT has a 667.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

T400 4 GB, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.