Radeon 880M vs RX 7700S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700S and Radeon 880M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7700S
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
39.64
+97.5%

RX 7700S outperforms 880M by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.1891.73
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Strix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1500 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2500 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate320.092.80
Floating-point processing power20.48 TFLOPS2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12832
Ray Tracing Cores3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700S 39.64
+97.5%
Radeon 880M 20.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700S 15275
+97.5%
Radeon 880M 7733

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7700S 37918
+173%
Radeon 880M 13892

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7700S 24246
+190%
Radeon 880M 8371

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7700S 10206
+240%
Radeon 880M 3006

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
+251%
35
−251%
1440p61
+177%
22
−177%
4K52
+117%
24−27
−117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+105%
65−70
−105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+120%
40−45
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+106%
95−100
−106%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2025%
8−9
−2025%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+3725%
4−5
−3725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+368%
27−30
−368%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+2800%
3−4
−2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+105%
65−70
−105%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+120%
40−45
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+106%
95−100
−106%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2025%
8−9
−2025%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+4075%
4−5
−4075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+844%
9−10
−844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+368%
27−30
−368%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+2800%
3−4
−2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+109%
35−40
−109%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+120%
40−45
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+106%
95−100
−106%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2025%
8−9
−2025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 144
+3500%
4−5
−3500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+833%
9−10
−833%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+102%
65−70
−102%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+111%
45−50
−111%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+100%
40−45
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+110%
30−33
−110%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+100%
24−27
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+108%
110−120
−108%
Hitman 3 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+4450%
2−3
−4450%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 92
+104%
45−50
−104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+98%
100−105
−98%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Hitman 3 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+97.9%
95−100
−97.9%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+100%
27−30
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+105%
21−24
−105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+100%
24−27
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1750%
2−3
−1750%

This is how RX 7700S and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 251% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 177% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 117% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 4450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700S surpassed Radeon 880M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.64 20.07
Recency 4 January 2023 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

RX 7700S has a 97.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 880M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 880M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 106 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.