Radeon RX 7700S vs 610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 610M and Radeon RX 7700S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 610M
2023
15 Watt
2.85

RX 7700S outperforms 610M by a whopping 1291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking792110
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Power efficiency13.0327.18
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDragon RangeNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282048
Core clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate17.60320.0
Floating-point processing power0.5632 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Cores232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 610M 2.85
RX 7700S 39.64
+1291%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 610M 1098
RX 7700S 15275
+1291%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 610M 2863
RX 7700S 37918
+1224%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 610M 1965
RX 7700S 24246
+1134%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 610M 576
RX 7700S 10206
+1673%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−779%
123
+779%
1440p79
+29.5%
61
−29.5%
4K3−4
−1633%
52
+1633%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1117%
70−75
+1117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−867%
85−90
+867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1117%
70−75
+1117%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1207%
190−200
+1207%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1175%
150−160
+1175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−236%
130−140
+236%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−867%
85−90
+867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−2560%
130−140
+2560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1117%
70−75
+1117%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1175%
100−110
+1175%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1207%
190−200
+1207%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−1093%
167
+1093%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−236%
130−140
+236%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−867%
85−90
+867%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7000%
70−75
+7000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1117%
70−75
+1117%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1207%
190−200
+1207%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−1340%
144
+1340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−1100%
84
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−236%
130−140
+236%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1500%
80−85
+1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1475%
60−65
+1475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Hitman 3 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1065%
190−200
+1065%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1083%
70−75
+1083%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 55−60
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−825%
35−40
+825%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 92
+0%
92
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+0%
48
+0%

This is how Radeon 610M and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 779% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 610M is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 1633% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7700S is 7000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 39.64
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

Radeon 610M has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7700S, on the other hand, has a 1290.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 786 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 106 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.