Radeon R9 Nano vs RX 7600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon R9 Nano, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
43.00
+95.4%

RX 7600 outperforms R9 Nano by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking88252
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation90.965.31
Power efficiency17.878.62
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNavi 33Fiji
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date24 May 2023 (1 year ago)27 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7600 has 1613% better value for money than R9 Nano.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484096
Compute unitsno data64
Core clock speed1720 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2655 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8256.0
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS8.192 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128256
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length204 mm152 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data+
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s512 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.11x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.76.3
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.22.0
Vulkan1.3+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600 43.00
+95.4%
R9 Nano 22.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600 16575
+95.3%
R9 Nano 8486

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600 43430
+151%
R9 Nano 17282

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 7600 114647
+163%
R9 Nano 43546

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600 32404
+126%
R9 Nano 14362

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600 183336
+125%
R9 Nano 81374

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 7600 646153
+60.5%
R9 Nano 402499

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD142
+59.6%
89
−59.6%
1440p67
+123%
30−35
−123%
4K35
−25.7%
44
+25.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.897.29
1440p4.0121.63
4K7.6914.75

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 148
+323%
35−40
−323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+97.3%
35−40
−97.3%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+88.9%
70−75
−88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 117
+234%
35−40
−234%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+76.5%
50−55
−76.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+79.3%
55−60
−79.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+49.6%
130−140
−49.6%
Hitman 3 90−95
+107%
40−45
−107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+66.3%
100−110
−66.3%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+73.7%
75−80
−73.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+116%
70−75
−116%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+38.5%
95−100
−38.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+97.3%
35−40
−97.3%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+88.9%
70−75
−88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 100
+186%
35−40
−186%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+76.5%
50−55
−76.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+79.3%
55−60
−79.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+49.6%
130−140
−49.6%
Hitman 3 90−95
+107%
40−45
−107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+66.3%
100−110
−66.3%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+73.7%
75−80
−73.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230
+215%
70−75
−215%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+81.3%
45−50
−81.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+38.5%
95−100
−38.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90−95
+83.7%
45−50
−83.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+97.3%
35−40
−97.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+157%
35−40
−157%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+76.5%
50−55
−76.5%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+49.6%
130−140
−49.6%
Hitman 3 90−95
+107%
40−45
−107%
Horizon Zero Dawn 172
+65.4%
100−110
−65.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+173%
70−75
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 123
+162%
47
−162%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+38.5%
95−100
−38.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+95.2%
40−45
−95.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+91.2%
30−35
−91.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+100%
21−24
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+331%
12−14
−331%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+96%
24−27
−96%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+87.9%
120−130
−87.9%
Hitman 3 55−60
+115%
24−27
−115%
Horizon Zero Dawn 127
+182%
45−50
−182%
Metro Exodus 118
+188%
40−45
−188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+180%
45−50
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+231%
24−27
−231%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+58.3%
120−130
−58.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+97.3%
35−40
−97.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+95.5%
21−24
−95.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+112%
16−18
−112%
Hitman 3 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+66.7%
110−120
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+68.6%
35
−68.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+133%
12−14
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+380%
5−6
−380%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.7%
30−33
−96.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+165%
24−27
−165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%

This is how RX 7600 and R9 Nano compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 is 60% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600 is 123% faster in 1440p
  • R9 Nano is 26% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600 is 380% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7600 surpassed R9 Nano in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.00 22.01
Recency 24 May 2023 27 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 175 Watt

RX 7600 has a 95.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 6.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 Nano in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Radeon R9 Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1894 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 90 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.