Radeon RX 7900 XT vs RX 6900 XT

Place in the ranking	22	14
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	29.88	37.56
Power efficiency	16.14	17.39
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XT has 26% better value for money than RX 6900 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	5376
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	1387 MHz
Boost clock speed	2250 MHz	2394 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	720.0	804.4
Floating-point processing power	23.04 TFLOPS	51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	192
TMUs	320	336
Ray Tracing Cores	80	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	276 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	800.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6900 XT 69.45

RX 7900 XT 74.83
+7.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6900 XT 26791

RX 7900 XT 28868
+7.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6900 XT 59119

RX 7900 XT 75896
+28.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6900 XT 50587

RX 7900 XT 63712
+25.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	195 −6.2%	207 +6.2%
1440p	125 −9.6%	137 +9.6%
4K	79 −12.7%	89 +12.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.12	4.34
1440p	7.99	6.56
4K	12.65	10.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

130−140

−75.6%

237
+75.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	117 −30.8%	150−160 +30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	169 +25.2%	130−140 −25.2%
Battlefield 5	220−230 −8.1%	240−250 +8.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −57%	212 +57%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 −8.8%	180−190 +8.8%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 −2.5%	240−250 +2.5%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 −5.9%	260−270 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −9.2%	300−350 +9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	279 +82.4%	150−160 −82.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	142 +5.2%	130−140 −5.2%
Battlefield 5	220−230 −8.1%	240−250 +8.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −40.7%	190 +40.7%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	170−180 −8.8%	180−190 +8.8%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 −2.5%	240−250 +2.5%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 −5.9%	260−270 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −67.9%	492 +67.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −8.7%	160−170 +8.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 −56.1%	150−160 +56.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	137 +1.5%	130−140 −1.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	130−140 −32.6%	179 +32.6%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Forza Horizon 4	248 +1.6%	240−250 −1.6%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	283 −23.7%	350 +23.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 −44.7%	424 +44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	164 −61.6%	265 +61.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 −26.4%	150−160 +26.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

−0.8%

120−130
+0.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 −0.6%	160−170 +0.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 +11.2%	85−90 −11.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	109 +12.4%	95−100 −12.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −64.9%	122 +64.9%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −2.4%	80−85 +2.4%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Hitman 3	100−110 −7.9%	100−110 +7.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	224 −23.7%	277 +23.7%
Metro Exodus	117 −20.5%	141 +20.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	190−200 −65%	325 +65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −9.5%	130−140 +9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	230−240 −0.4%	240−250 +0.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−5.3%

120−130
+5.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −1.1%	85−90 +1.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hitman 3	83 +23.9%	65−70 −23.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	110−120 −10.9%	120−130 +10.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 −30.3%	159 +30.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +7.9%	60−65 −7.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 +8.2%	60−65 −8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −71.4%	60 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +19.1%	130−140 −19.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −57.3%	173 +57.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	54 +8%	50−55 −8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80

−12%

80−85
+12%

This is how RX 6900 XT and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 6% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 10% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 82% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 76% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is ahead in 12 tests (17%)
RX 7900 XT is ahead in 51 test (71%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	69.45	74.83
Recency	28 October 2020	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm

RX 7900 XT has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6900 XT and Radeon RX 7900 XT.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.