Radeon RX 7700 XT vs RX 6600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 and Radeon RX 7700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
39.31

RX 7700 XT outperforms RX 6600 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11040
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.9170.96
Power efficiency20.7616.54
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 October 2021 (3 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 4% better value for money than RX 6600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923456
Core clock speed1626 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speed2491 MHz2544 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate279.0549.5
Floating-point processing power8.928 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs112216
Ray Tracing Cores2854

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length190 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 39.31
RX 7700 XT 58.14
+47.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6600 15164
RX 7700 XT 22428
+47.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6600 31774
RX 7700 XT 57340
+80.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6600 94734
RX 7700 XT 126733
+33.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6600 23366
RX 7700 XT 42801
+83.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 145870
RX 7700 XT 201871
+38.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6600 545762
RX 7700 XT 730434
+33.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
−65.8%
189
+65.8%
1440p57
−78.9%
102
+78.9%
4K31
−93.5%
60
+93.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.892.38
1440p5.774.40
4K10.617.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 107
−80.4%
193
+80.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−98.8%
165
+98.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
−59.3%
180
+59.3%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−45.2%
180−190
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−38%
100−110
+38%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
−73.6%
158
+73.6%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−28.2%
100−110
+28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−43.3%
130−140
+43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−17.3%
220−230
+17.3%
Hitman 3 99
−19.2%
110−120
+19.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−34.4%
210−220
+34.4%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−21.4%
150−160
+21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−23.9%
110−120
+23.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
−61.5%
230−240
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−14%
140−150
+14%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−228%
272
+228%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
−62%
149
+62%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−45.2%
180−190
+45.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−38%
100−110
+38%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
−80.8%
132
+80.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−28.2%
100−110
+28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−43.3%
130−140
+43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−17.3%
220−230
+17.3%
Hitman 3 95
−24.2%
110−120
+24.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−34.4%
210−220
+34.4%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−21.4%
150−160
+21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−23.9%
110−120
+23.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 182
−83.5%
334
+83.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−14%
140−150
+14%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−45.8%
121
+45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−69.2%
132
+69.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
−38%
100−110
+38%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
−107%
122
+107%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−28.2%
100−110
+28.2%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−20.9%
231
+20.9%
Hitman 3 86
−37.2%
110−120
+37.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
−52.1%
216
+52.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
−82.8%
287
+82.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−86.7%
168
+86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
−153%
140−150
+153%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−23.9%
110−120
+23.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−65.3%
120−130
+65.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−50%
90−95
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−133%
98
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
−94.2%
101
+94.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−47.8%
65−70
+47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−135%
80
+135%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−48.9%
65−70
+48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−22.7%
270−280
+22.7%
Hitman 3 54
−50%
80−85
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
−67.6%
171
+67.6%
Metro Exodus 97
−38.1%
134
+38.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
−91.1%
193
+91.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−111%
120
+111%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
−19.3%
220−230
+19.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−46.3%
95−100
+46.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−63.6%
50−55
+63.6%
Hitman 3 36
−36.1%
45−50
+36.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
−19.8%
210−220
+19.8%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−68%
80−85
+68%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−102%
89
+102%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−115%
58
+115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−146%
59
+146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−64%
40−45
+64%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−157%
36
+157%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−65.2%
35−40
+65.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−148%
134
+148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
−83%
97
+83%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%

This is how RX 6600 and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 66% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 79% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 94% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 228% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed RX 6600 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.31 58.14
Recency 13 October 2021 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 245 Watt

RX 6600 has 85.6% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 47.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9319 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1417 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.