GMA 3150 vs Radeon RX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 570 Radeon RX 570X Radeon RX 580 Radeon RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580X Radeon RX 590 GME
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA 3000 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA 3600

Contents

RX 580 RX 580
GMA 3150 GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2481535
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.21no data
Power efficiency8.56no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 20Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1257 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate193.00.8
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs1442

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 580 8847
+442250%
GMA 3150 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96no data
1440p44no data
4K38no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p5.20no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 83 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 117 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 51 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 77 no data
Metro Exodus 57 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data
World of Tanks 240−250 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 5 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data
World of Tanks 150−160 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 53 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 57 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 57 no data
Metro Exodus 18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 73 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Fortnite 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 18−20 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 18 April 2017 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 13 Watt

RX 580 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1323.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 is a desktop card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
R9 390 Radeon R9 390
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
ATI Mobility X1700 Mobility Radeon X1700
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
HD 7790 Quadro K2200
vs
Quadro K2200 Radeon HD 7790
R9 290 Iris Pro Graphics 6200
vs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R9 290
R7 260 GeForce RTX 3060
vs
RTX 3060 Radeon R7 260
R7 360 Radeon Graphics 512SP
vs
Graphics 512SP Radeon R7 360
R5 430 OEM Arc A580
vs
Arc A580 Radeon R5 430 OEM
RX 580 GMA 3100
vs
GMA 3100 Radeon RX 580
RX 580 GeForce 930A
vs
GeForce 930A Radeon RX 580
RX 580 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 Radeon RX 580
RX 550 RX 550
vs
RX 540 OEM RX 540 OEM
RX 550 GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition
vs
GT 650M Mac Edition Radeon RX 550

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 21753 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 141 vote

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.