Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX 5700

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 with Iris Plus Graphics 645, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
37.41
+741%

RX 5700 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 645 by a whopping 741% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122663
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation45.28no data
Power efficiency14.4920.69
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 10Coffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1465 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate248.450.40
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs646
TMUs14448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length268 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 37.41
+741%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 4.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14432
+742%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1715

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5700 31470
+954%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5700 23746
+1154%
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114
+356%
25
−356%
1440p67
+857%
7−8
−857%
4K42
+950%
4−5
−950%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
1440p5.21no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 84
+1100%
7−8
−1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+600%
10−12
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 97
+3133%
3−4
−3133%
Battlefield 5 180
+1900%
9−10
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+1033%
9−10
−1033%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+971%
7−8
−971%
Far Cry 5 112
+1300%
8−9
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 99
+800%
10−12
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 288
+1100%
24−27
−1100%
Hitman 3 76
+744%
9−10
−744%
Horizon Zero Dawn 294
+989%
27−30
−989%
Metro Exodus 144
+1700%
8−9
−1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+1030%
10−11
−1030%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+807%
14−16
−807%
Watch Dogs: Legion 259
+502%
40−45
−502%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130
+1082%
10−12
−1082%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+2567%
3−4
−2567%
Battlefield 5 145
+1511%
9−10
−1511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 92
+922%
9−10
−922%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+857%
7−8
−857%
Far Cry 5 90
+1025%
8−9
−1025%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
+718%
10−12
−718%
Forza Horizon 4 276
+1050%
24−27
−1050%
Hitman 3 75
+733%
9−10
−733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 291
+978%
27−30
−978%
Metro Exodus 143
+1688%
8−9
−1688%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+880%
10−11
−880%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 175
+1067%
14−16
−1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Watch Dogs: Legion 243
+465%
40−45
−465%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60
+445%
10−12
−445%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+729%
7−8
−729%
Far Cry 5 64
+700%
8−9
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+392%
24−27
−392%
Hitman 3 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
Horizon Zero Dawn 119
+341%
27−30
−341%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 155
+933%
14−16
−933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+469%
16−18
−469%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
+34.9%
40−45
−34.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 102
+920%
10−11
−920%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Far Cry New Dawn 73
+1117%
6−7
−1117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+783%
6−7
−783%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+1567%
3−4
−1567%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Far Cry 5 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
Forza Horizon 4 267
+6575%
4−5
−6575%
Hitman 3 55
+588%
8−9
−588%
Horizon Zero Dawn 93
+933%
9−10
−933%
Metro Exodus 94
+840%
10−11
−840%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+800%
12−14
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+876%
24−27
−876%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70
+775%
8−9
−775%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Hitman 3 39 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
+867%
12−14
−867%
Metro Exodus 57 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+860%
5−6
−860%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 15 0−1
Far Cry 5 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+3400%
2−3
−3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+814%
7−8
−814%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+600%
5−6
−600%

This is how RX 5700 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 356% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 857% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 950% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 is 6575% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5700 surpassed Iris Plus Graphics 645 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.41 4.45
Recency 7 July 2019 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

RX 5700 has a 740.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Plus Graphics 645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 1100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics 645 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1746 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 121 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.