GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.27
+74.3%

RX 5600 XT outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking143271
Place by popularity9062
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.91no data
Power efficiency16.1227.74
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 10TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1130 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate224.695.04
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.27
+74.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13592
+74.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5600 XT 31310
+136%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+97.6%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5600 XT 22058
+122%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 115838
+77.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5600 XT 548796
+33.8%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+84.5%
58
−84.5%
1440p61
+29.8%
47
−29.8%
4K36
+63.6%
22
−63.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.61no data
1440p4.57no data
4K7.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83
+40.7%
59
−40.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+24.6%
61
−24.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+87.8%
49
−87.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+72.7%
65−70
−72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104
+96.2%
53
−96.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+60.9%
46
−60.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+13%
69
−13%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+6%
84
−6%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+46%
120−130
−46%
Hitman 3 83
+62.7%
51
−62.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 275
+51.9%
181
−51.9%
Metro Exodus 144
+58.2%
91
−58.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
+155%
44
−155%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+89.6%
65−70
−89.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 262
+30.3%
201
−30.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 173
+284%
45−50
−284%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+138%
32
−138%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+72.7%
65−70
−72.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98
+109%
47
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+75%
36
−75%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+34.5%
58
−34.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+50.8%
59
−50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+46%
120−130
−46%
Hitman 3 83
+66%
50
−66%
Horizon Zero Dawn 272
+51.1%
180
−51.1%
Metro Exodus 140
+77.2%
79
−77.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 94
+141%
39
−141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+111%
75
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+64.4%
45−50
−64.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
+35.5%
183
−35.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+181%
27
−181%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
+313%
15
−313%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+155%
31
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+58.8%
34
−58.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+100%
39
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 138
+11.3%
120−130
−11.3%
Hitman 3 77
+79.1%
43
−79.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
+79.7%
64
−79.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+124%
63
−124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+115%
39
−115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
+59.1%
22
−59.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88
+115%
41
−115%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+71.8%
35−40
−71.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+42.1%
38
−42.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+182%
21−24
−182%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+87.5%
16
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+57.7%
26
−57.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+78.8%
110−120
−78.8%
Hitman 3 52
+85.7%
28
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+117%
40−45
−117%
Metro Exodus 88
+132%
35−40
−132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+137%
40−45
−137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 242
+102%
120
−102%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
+109%
30−35
−109%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+75%
20−22
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+45%
20
−45%
Hitman 3 36
+125%
16
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 107
+155%
42
−155%
Metro Exodus 51
+132%
21−24
−132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+84%
25
−84%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+236%
10−12
−236%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+100%
6
−100%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+150%
27−30
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+148%
21−24
−148%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+117%
18−20
−117%

This is how RX 5600 XT and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 84% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 30% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600 XT is 64% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 313% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5600 XT surpassed GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.27 20.23
Recency 21 January 2020 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 74.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2862 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1672 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.