UHD Graphics vs Radeon RX 560 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 Mobile and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 560 Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
9.65
+101%

RX 560 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432617
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.67no data
Power efficiency13.8637.99
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBaffinJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2017 (8 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896256
Core clock speed1175 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate58.9712.00
Floating-point processing power1.887 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+105%
21−24
−105%
4K36
+125%
16−18
−125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33no data
4K2.78no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
Fortnite 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49
+104%
24−27
−104%
Valorant 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+107%
75−80
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Dota 2 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Far Cry 5 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Fortnite 63
+110%
30−33
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45
+114%
21−24
−114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+119%
16−18
−119%
Valorant 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+119%
21−24
−119%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Dota 2 70−75
+111%
35−40
−111%
Far Cry 5 27
+125%
12−14
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+114%
21−24
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Valorant 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50
+108%
24−27
−108%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+129%
35−40
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+119%
27−30
−119%
Valorant 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Valorant 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
+125%
16−18
−125%

This is how RX 560 Mobile and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 Mobile is 105% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560 Mobile is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.65 4.81
Recency 5 January 2017 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 10 Watt

RX 560 Mobile has a 100.6% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile
Radeon RX 560
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7365 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560 Mobile or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.