Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs RX 560 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 560 Mobile with Radeon Pro WX 4150, including specs and performance data.
RX 560 Mobile outperforms Pro WX 4150 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 422 | 559 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.67 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.04 | 9.51 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | Baffin |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 March 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 | 58.97 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.887 TFLOPS | 1.887 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 43
+79.2%
| 24−27
−79.2%
|
| 4K | 36
+71.4%
| 21−24
−71.4%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.33 | no data |
| 4K | 2.78 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Elden Ring | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18−20
−83.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+68.2%
|
21−24
−68.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+72.2%
|
18−20
−72.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+45%
|
20−22
−45%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+68.2%
|
21−24
−68.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+66.7%
|
24−27
−66.7%
|
| Elden Ring | 30−35
+83.3%
|
18−20
−83.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+45.2%
|
30−35
−45.2%
|
| Fortnite | 40
−2.5%
|
40−45
+2.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
+66.7%
|
24−27
−66.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+72.2%
|
18−20
−72.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 83
+48.2%
|
55−60
−48.2%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+45%
|
20−22
−45%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
+47.6%
|
21−24
−47.6%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
| World of Tanks | 150−160
+46.7%
|
100−110
−46.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+68.2%
|
21−24
−68.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+66.7%
|
24−27
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+45.2%
|
30−35
−45.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+60.7%
|
27−30
−60.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 29
−93.1%
|
55−60
+93.1%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+95.5%
|
21−24
−95.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Elden Ring | 16−18
+77.8%
|
9−10
−77.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+44.7%
|
35−40
−44.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| World of Tanks | 80−85
+60%
|
50−55
−60%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+83.3%
|
12−14
−83.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+78.6%
|
14−16
−78.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+92.3%
|
12−14
−92.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+120%
|
10−11
−120%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Elden Ring | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+23.5%
|
16−18
−23.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+65%
|
20−22
−65%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+23.5%
|
16−18
−23.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+75%
|
8−9
−75%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
+71.4%
|
7−8
−71.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+100%
|
7−8
−100%
|
| Valorant | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7−8
−57.1%
|
This is how RX 560 Mobile and Pro WX 4150 compete in popular games:
- RX 560 Mobile is 79% faster in 1080p
- RX 560 Mobile is 71% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560 Mobile is 500% faster.
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 93% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 560 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
- Pro WX 4150 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.22 | 6.91 |
| Recency | 5 January 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
RX 560 Mobile has a 62.4% higher aggregate performance score.
Pro WX 4150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 10% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 560 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
