Radeon RX 6300M vs RX 550X Mobile

Place in the ranking	586	330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.41	32.73
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 23	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	768
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1287 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	51.48	115.2
Floating-point processing power	1.647 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−171%

65−70
+171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −175%	30−35 +175%
Elden Ring	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −184%	50−55 +184%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −175%	30−35 +175%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −172%	65−70 +172%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −200%	45−50 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Valorant	18−20 −272%	65−70 +272%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −184%	50−55 +184%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −175%	30−35 +175%
Dota 2	18 −233%	60−65 +233%
Elden Ring	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Far Cry 5	19 −211%	55−60 +211%
Fortnite	35−40 −153%	90−95 +153%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −172%	65−70 +172%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −181%	55−60 +181%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −200%	45−50 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −168%	50−55 +168%
Valorant	18−20 −272%	65−70 +272%
World of Tanks	95−100 −114%	200−210 +114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −184%	50−55 +184%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −175%	30−35 +175%
Dota 2	49 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −111%	55−60 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −172%	65−70 +172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −129%	110−120 +129%
Valorant	18−20 −272%	65−70 +272%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
Elden Ring	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7 −317%	24−27 +317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −316%	150−160 +316%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
World of Tanks	40−45 −161%	110−120 +161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −240%	30−35 +240%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −310%	40−45 +310%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Valorant	16−18 −163%	40−45 +163%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −70.6%	27−30 +70.6%
Elden Ring	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 −172%	45−50 +172%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −220%	16−18 +220%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	16−18 −70.6%	27−30 +70.6%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −200%	21−24 +200%
Fortnite	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Valorant	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

RX 6300M is 171% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6300M is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.11	16.64
Recency	11 April 2018	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt

RX 6300M has a 172.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.