Radeon 780M vs RX 5500M

Place in the ranking	358	298
Place by popularity	not in top-100	47
Power efficiency	11.83	85.04
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Hawx Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 October 2019 (5 years ago)	6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	768
Core clock speed	1375 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1645 MHz	2700 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	144.8	129.6
Floating-point processing power	4.632 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	88	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500M 14.43

Radeon 780M 18.30
+26.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500M 5568

Radeon 780M 7061
+26.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5500M 16476
+28.9%

Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5500M 12276
+53.9%

Radeon 780M 7977

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5500M 50946
+5.9%

Radeon 780M 48105

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5500M 210925

Radeon 780M 429810
+104%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 5500M 4298
+51.8%

Radeon 780M 2832

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	57 +58.3%	36 −58.3%
1440p	56 +180%	20 −180%
4K	27 +80%	15 −80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55
+41%

−41%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +4.9%	40−45 −4.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +86.7%	30−33 −86.7%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −30.4%	60−65 +30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +43.2%	35−40 −43.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 +38.7%	31 −38.7%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −30.3%	40−45 +30.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −25.6%	45−50 +25.6%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −23.7%	110−120 +23.7%
Hitman 3	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	146 +62.2%	90−95 −62.2%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −31.3%	60−65 +31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	57 +16.3%	45−50 −16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −30.4%	60−65 +30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	169 +94.3%	85−90 −94.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −24.2%	40−45 +24.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Battlefield 5	34 −76.5%	60−65 +76.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	48 +29.7%	35−40 −29.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +37.5%	24 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −30.3%	40−45 +30.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −25.6%	45−50 +25.6%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −23.7%	110−120 +23.7%
Hitman 3	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	144 +60%	90−95 −60%
Metro Exodus	36 −75%	60−65 +75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	52 +6.1%	45−50 −6.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	82 +51.9%	54 −51.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −23.5%	40−45 +23.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	168 +93.1%	85−90 −93.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 −32.3%	40−45 +32.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 −114%	30−33 +114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	26 −42.3%	35−40 +42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +30.4%	23 −30.4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −30.3%	40−45 +30.3%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −23.7%	110−120 +23.7%
Hitman 3	50 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	69 +30.2%	53 −30.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	72 +56.5%	46 −56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 +55.2%	29 −55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 +22.2%	18 −22.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

54
+10.2%

45−50

−10.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	54 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −27.3%	27−30 +27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −35.7%	18−20 +35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 −60%	16−18 +60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −37%	100−105 +37%
Hitman 3	33 +50%	21−24 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Metro Exodus	47 +38.2%	30−35 −38.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −28%	32 +28%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −33.3%	20 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	163 +48.2%	110−120 −48.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40
+33.3%

30−33

−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Hitman 3	9 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65 −44.6%	90−95 +44.6%
Metro Exodus	28 +47.4%	18−20 −47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −15.4%	15 +15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −31.6%	24−27 +31.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −30.8%	17 +30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20
+25%

16−18

−25%

This is how RX 5500M and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

RX 5500M is 58% faster in 1080p
RX 5500M is 180% faster in 1440p
RX 5500M is 80% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5500M is 94% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 780M is 114% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5500M is ahead in 32 tests (44%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 40 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.43	18.30
Recency	7 October 2019	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	7 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 26.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5500M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.