GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile

Place in the ranking	555	520
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.47	no data
Power efficiency	9.56	7.23
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	Lexa	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 July 2017 (7 years ago)	13 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1152 or 640
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	797 MHz
Boost clock speed	1287 MHz	1085 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	51.48	43.40
Floating-point processing power	1.647 TFLOPS	1.389 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	GDDR5
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	Up to 2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	80.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
Ansel	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 550 Mobile 6.97

GTX 860M 7.91
+13.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 550 Mobile 4559

GTX 860M 4902
+7.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 550 Mobile 3645

GTX 860M 3904
+7.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 550 Mobile 23050

GTX 860M 27961
+21.3%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 550 Mobile 239256
+11.2%

GTX 860M 215144

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	80−85 −13.8%	91 +13.8%
Full HD	16 −125%	36 +125%
4K	10−12 −30%	13 +30%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.00	no data
4K	8.00	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−20%

12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −13%	50−55 +13%
Hitman 3	12 −25%	14−16 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −13%	24−27 +13%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −13%	50−55 +13%
Hitman 3	12 −25%	14−16 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −186%	60 +186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −5.7%	55−60 +5.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −13%	50−55 +13%
Hitman 3	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 +100%	12 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4 −1300%	55−60 +1300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−15.8%

21−24
+15.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−8.3%

12−14
+8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −33.3%	27−30 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−14.3%

8−9
+14.3%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and GTX 860M compete in popular games:

GTX 860M is 14% faster in 900p
GTX 860M is 125% faster in 1080p
GTX 860M is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 550 Mobile is 100% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 860M is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 550 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
GTX 860M is ahead in 65 tests (90%)
there's a draw in 6 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.97	7.91
Recency	2 July 2017	13 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt