Radeon RX 7600M XT vs RX 5300M

Place in the ranking	419	151
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.16	19.88
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 14	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)	4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	2048
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1445 MHz	2469 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	127.2	316.0
Floating-point processing power	4.069 TFLOPS	20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	88	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 11.16

RX 7600M XT 34.21
+207%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300M 4307

RX 7600M XT 13196
+206%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5300M 14351

RX 7600M XT 37202
+159%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5300M 39264

RX 7600M XT 94691
+141%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5300M 10306

RX 7600M XT 28271
+174%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5300M 55837

RX 7600M XT 152903
+174%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 5300M 3567

RX 7600M XT 9527
+167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	62 −93.5%	120 +93.5%
1440p	18−20 −228%	59 +228%
4K	10−12 −250%	35 +250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−200%

50−55
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	59 −122%	131 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −718%	139 +718%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −180%	95−100 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	51 −21.6%	60−65 +21.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	70 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	79 +2.6%	75−80 −2.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −123%	160−170 +123%
Hitman 3	21−24 −200%	60−65 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −123%	130−140 +123%
Metro Exodus	87 −65.5%	144 +65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 −7%	75−80 +7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −192%	100−110 +192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −70.1%	110−120 +70.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −812%	237 +812%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −571%	114 +571%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −180%	95−100 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	41 −51.2%	60−65 +51.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	61 −11.5%	65−70 +11.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 −42.6%	75−80 +42.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −123%	160−170 +123%
Hitman 3	21−24 −200%	60−65 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −123%	130−140 +123%
Metro Exodus	68 −109%	142 +109%
Red Dead Redemption 2	59 −28.8%	75−80 +28.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −478%	208 +478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −121%	60−65 +121%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −70.1%	110−120 +70.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −240%	85 +240%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −441%	92 +441%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	22 −182%	60−65 +182%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry 5	38 −78.9%	65−70 +78.9%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −143%	180 +143%
Hitman 3	21−24 −200%	60−65 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −133%	140 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −400%	180 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 −163%	100 +163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +11.7%	60 −11.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−43.4%

75−80
+43.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −159%	55−60 +159%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −171%	45−50 +171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −464%	62 +464%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −857%	67 +857%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −235%	170−180 +235%
Hitman 3	14−16 −164%	35−40 +164%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −361%	106 +361%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −441%	92 +441%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −650%	120 +650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −573%	74 +573%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −131%	160−170 +131%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−183%

50−55
+183%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −200%	24−27 +200%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −196%	150−160 +196%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −890%	99 +890%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −478%	52 +478%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −433%	32 +433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −500%	30 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −543%	90 +543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −700%	64 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −450%	22 +450%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−160%

24−27
+160%

This is how RX 5300M and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

RX 7600M XT is 94% faster in 1080p
RX 7600M XT is 228% faster in 1440p
RX 7600M XT is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5300M is 12% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 890% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5300M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RX 7600M XT is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.16	34.21
Recency	13 November 2019	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	120 Watt

RX 5300M has 41.2% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 206.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.