Radeon RX 7700S vs RX 7600M XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7600M XT and Radeon RX 7700S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7600M XT
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
34.22

RX 7700S outperforms RX 7600M XT by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.5527.18
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 33Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1280 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2469 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors13,300 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate316.0320.0
Floating-point processing power20.23 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs128128
Ray Tracing Cores3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7600M XT 34.22
RX 7700S 39.64
+15.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7600M XT 13186
RX 7700S 15275
+15.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7600M XT 38039
+0.3%
RX 7700S 37918

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7600M XT 28686
+18.3%
RX 7700S 24246

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX 7600M XT 9555
RX 7700S 10206
+6.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
−3.4%
123
+3.4%
1440p57
−7%
61
+7%
4K33
−57.6%
52
+57.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−43.1%
70−75
+43.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+50.6%
85−90
−50.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 139
+95.8%
70−75
−95.8%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−35.7%
130−140
+35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−33.9%
80−85
+33.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−43.1%
70−75
+43.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−29.4%
85−90
+29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−32.5%
100−110
+32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−18.8%
190−200
+18.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
−39.7%
85−90
+39.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−26.9%
170−180
+26.9%
Metro Exodus 144
+10.8%
130−140
−10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−25%
95−100
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
−45.7%
150−160
+45.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−14.9%
130−140
+14.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 237
+172%
85−90
−172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+60.6%
70−75
−60.6%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−35.7%
130−140
+35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−33.9%
80−85
+33.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−43.1%
70−75
+43.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−29.4%
85−90
+29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
−32.5%
100−110
+32.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
−18.8%
190−200
+18.8%
Hitman 3 60−65
−39.7%
85−90
+39.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
−26.9%
170−180
+26.9%
Metro Exodus 142
+9.2%
130−140
−9.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−25%
95−100
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 208
+24.6%
167
−24.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−32.8%
85−90
+32.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−14.9%
130−140
+14.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
−2.4%
85−90
+2.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+29.6%
70−75
−29.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−33.9%
80−85
+33.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
−43.1%
70−75
+43.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−29.4%
85−90
+29.4%
Forza Horizon 4 180
−8.9%
190−200
+8.9%
Hitman 3 60−65
−39.7%
85−90
+39.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
−21.4%
170−180
+21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 180
+25%
144
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+19%
84
−19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−118%
130−140
+118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
−25%
95−100
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−40.4%
80−85
+40.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−37%
60−65
+37%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+45.7%
45−50
−45.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−40%
45−50
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−31.6%
220−230
+31.6%
Hitman 3 35−40
−45.9%
50−55
+45.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 106
+16.5%
90−95
−16.5%
Metro Exodus 92
+19.5%
75−80
−19.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+30.4%
92
−30.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+21.3%
60−65
−21.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
−22.2%
190−200
+22.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−39.2%
70−75
+39.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Hitman 3 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−24.5%
180−190
+24.5%
Metro Exodus 99
+83.3%
50−55
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+20.9%
43
−20.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+14.3%
27−30
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+55.2%
55−60
−55.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+33.3%
48
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−42.3%
35−40
+42.3%

This is how RX 7600M XT and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 7% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 172% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 118% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 23 tests (32%)
  • RX 7700S is ahead in 49 tests (68%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.22 39.64
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 100 Watt

RX 7700S has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 71 vote

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 106 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.