Radeon RX 550 vs RX 470 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with Radeon RX 550, including specs and performance data.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
18.23
+157%

RX 470 Mobile outperforms RX 550 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking306551
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.152.92
Power efficiency14.769.75
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmereLexa
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)20 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 $79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 Mobile has 248% better value for money than RX 550.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed926 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1074 MHz1183 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate137.537.86
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPS1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Elden Ring 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Valorant 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Dota 2 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Elden Ring 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Fortnite 95−100
+180%
35−40
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Valorant 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
World of Tanks 220−230
+159%
85−90
−159%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Dota 2 65−70
+171%
24−27
−171%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Valorant 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Elden Ring 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+175%
60−65
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
World of Tanks 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Valorant 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Dota 2 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Elden Ring 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Fortnite 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Valorant 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.23 7.09
Recency 4 August 2016 20 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 50 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has a 157.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 70% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 6856 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.