Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce GTX 880M SLI

Place in the ranking	250	68
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	46.23
Power efficiency	7.54	13.92
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N15E-GX-A2	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 March 2014 (10 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	2560
Core clock speed	954 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 3540 Million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	206 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	413.0
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−116%

160−170
+116%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−114%

75−80
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −122%	160−170 +122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −118%	290−300 +118%
Hitman 3	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −121%	230−240 +121%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −124%	170−180 +124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −119%	160−170 +119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −119%	210−220 +119%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −122%	160−170 +122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −118%	290−300 +118%
Hitman 3	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −121%	230−240 +121%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −124%	170−180 +124%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −119%	160−170 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −119%	210−220 +119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −116%	80−85 +116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −116%	110−120 +116%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −118%	290−300 +118%
Hitman 3	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −121%	230−240 +121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −119%	160−170 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −108%	100−105 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −119%	210−220 +119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−107%

120−130

+107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −114%	90−95 +114%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −118%	270−280 +118%
Hitman 3	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −122%	100−105 +122%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −120%	280−290 +120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−122%

80−85
+122%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Hitman 3	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −121%	250−260 +121%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −108%	27−30 +108%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −117%	65−70 +117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−111%

40−45
+111%

This is how GTX 880M SLI and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE is 116% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.54	48.24
Recency	12 March 2014	17 October 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	206 Watt	250 Watt

GTX 880M SLI has 21.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 124% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 880M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 880M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.