Radeon Pro 5500M vs R9 M470X

Place in the ranking	505	313
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	14.31
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Emerald	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	1536
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	61.60	139.2
Floating-point processing power	1.971 TFLOPS	4.454 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	56	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M470X 8.44

Pro 5500M 17.64
+109%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M470X 3244

Pro 5500M 6780
+109%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −115%	58 +115%
1440p	27−30 −119%	59 +119%
4K	14−16 −136%	33 +136%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −111%	55−60 +111%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +13.3%	15 −13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −105%	41 +105%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −191%	67 +191%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −226%	75 +226%
Valorant	30−35 −174%	85 +174%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −111%	55−60 +111%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +41.7%	12 −41.7%
Dota 2	30−33 −177%	83 +177%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −72.2%	60−65 +72.2%
Fortnite	50−55 −92%	95−100 +92%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −135%	45−50 +135%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −130%	69 +130%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −100%	46 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −14.9%	77 +14.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −21.7%	28 +21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Valorant	30−35 −129%	70−75 +129%
World of Tanks	120−130 −65.1%	208 +65.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −111%	55−60 +111%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −106%	35−40 +106%
Dota 2	30−33 −257%	107 +257%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −111%	76 +111%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −115%	70−75 +115%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −135%	45−50 +135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −82.1%	120−130 +82.1%
Valorant	30−35 +10.7%	28 −10.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 −250%	35 +250%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −218%	35 +218%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −155%	107 +155%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
World of Tanks	60−65 −93.4%	118 +93.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −172%	49 +172%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −115%	27−30 +115%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −193%	41 +193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Valorant	21−24 −4.8%	22 +4.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Dota 2	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −146%	59 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	18−20 −184%	54 +184%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Fortnite	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Valorant	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%

4K
High Preset

World of Tanks

+0%

This is how R9 M470X and Pro 5500M compete in popular games:

Pro 5500M is 115% faster in 1080p
Pro 5500M is 119% faster in 1440p
Pro 5500M is 136% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M470X is 42% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5500M is 367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R9 M470X is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
Pro 5500M is ahead in 60 tests (92%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.44	17.64
Recency	15 May 2016	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm

Pro 5500M has a 109% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M470X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M470X is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.