Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs R9 M395

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395 and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M395
2015
4 GB GDDR5
12.73

R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms R9 M395 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking390381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.70
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)23 November 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed834 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data108.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.482 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1362 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data174.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−4.7%
45−50
+4.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−1.6%
65−70
+1.6%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.73 13.39
Recency 9 June 2015 23 November 2014

R9 M395 has an age advantage of 6 months.

R9 M295X Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 5.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M395 and Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.