Radeon Pro 580 vs R9 M395

Place in the ranking	387	270
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	9.28
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Polaris 20
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 June 2015 (9 years ago)	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	2304
Core clock speed	834 MHz	1100 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	5000 Million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	172.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	217.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395 12.73

Pro 580 20.09
+57.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395 4911

Pro 580 7753
+57.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

20−22

−50%

30−33
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −54.8%	130−140 +54.8%
Hitman 3	24−27 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −54.8%	130−140 +54.8%
Hitman 3	24−27 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −54.8%	130−140 +54.8%
Hitman 3	24−27 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−57.1%

55−60
+57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −50%	120−130 +50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−42.9%

30−33
+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Hitman 3	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −55.7%	95−100 +55.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−50%

18−20
+50%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.73	20.09
Recency	9 June 2015	5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm

Pro 580 has a 57.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.