HD Graphics 3000 vs Radeon R9 M295X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X with HD Graphics 3000, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X
2014
0 MB Not Listed, 250 Watt
13.34
+1921%

R9 M295X outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1921% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3791180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.71no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameAmethystSandy Bridge GT2+
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 November 2014 (9 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204896
Core clock speed723 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,160 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate92.5415.60
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS0.2496 TFLOPS
ROPs322
TMUs12812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount0 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthNot ListedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.43.1
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.34
+1921%
HD Graphics 3000 0.66

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M295X 5150
+1928%
HD Graphics 3000 254

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R9 M295X 29972
+1811%
HD Graphics 3000 1568

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 M295X 38132
+1424%
HD Graphics 3000 2503

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+411%
9
−411%
4K27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Hitman 3 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Hitman 3 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+580%
10−11
−580%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Hitman 3 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+617%
6−7
−617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+143%
30−33
−143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+3600%
1−2
−3600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Hitman 3 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+4050%
2−3
−4050%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

This is how R9 M295X and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X is 411% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M295X is 2600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M295X is 4050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 M295X surpassed HD Graphics 3000 in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.34 0.66
Recency 23 November 2014 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R9 M295X has a 1921.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R9 M295X is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook card while HD Graphics 3000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 2368 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.